Puddingstone Track
Deconstructed:
Contents |
|
Along the Track: BERKSHIRE & WILTSHIRE
Pangbourne,
Berks
"At the Nautical College"
(only mention 'The Lost Trackway', 1994):
Although the likelihood of
the Track crossing the Thames at or near Pangbourne was put into print in
both 1952 and 1957, it was only in the manuscript of his book that Dr. Rudge
told of an actual puddingstone there. This one he never saw, as he revealed
in the following confusing statement: "At the Nautical College (SU633763) a
puddingstone boulder was reported, but unconfirmed by me at SU616752 (Pangbourne
College.)"
The Nautical College was renamed as Pangbourne College in
1969, but why he gave two locations I don't know. The first map reference is a nonsense, as it marks a point more than
two-thirds of a mile from the college, in the village itself. The second is
far more likely, as it lands by a footpath through an empty field about 350m
south-west of the nearest college buildings. I've been unable to find out
any more, although it's possible that this boulder might be the iron-rich
conglomerate called ferricrete, which is apparently known to occur along the
valleys of the rivers Thames and Kennet in this area. The source of the
Pangbourne boulder might have been the old chalk pit whose position is still
marked on Ordnance Survey maps, only 200m from that second map reference.
Bucklebury,
Berks
"Holly Lane stone (a)"
(first mention in print 1952; read 1951):
Dr. Rudge felt that his
Track was still heading generally south-westwards, but found nothing more
until someone told him that a puddingstone existed six miles away beside
Holly Lane, at about SU535708. This is an ancient sunken track, mapped as
early as 1761, that winds through a tunnel of trees running roughly
north-eastward from Holly Farm House and the edge of Holly Wood. The grid
reference given is about halfway between the farm and Marlston Road.
Bucklebury,
Berks
"Holly Lane stone (b)"
(only mention 'The Lost Trackway', 1994):
A second puddingstone
was reported in Holly Lane by a Bucklebury resident, who said that it "lay
in the roadside hedge, but could not now locate it. The approximate location
is SU532706". This is about 375m further south-west, but I think it's at
least possible that two people were reporting the same stone years apart.
Bucklebury, Berks
"Holly Wood stones" (first
mention in print 1952; read 1951):
In his 1951 talk to the
Essex Field Club, his second about the Track, Dr. Rudge said the following,
which needs to be quoted in full: "We have reason to believe that the site
of a Mesolithic workshop floor discovered by Peake and Crawford in 1920 lies
upon the track, for a trail of conglomerate boulders pointing towards it was
found in Holly Wood, according to the Geological Survey, 1867. This trail of
five stones lay some two miles north-east of Thatcham, and pointed towards
the Thames at Pangbourne, forming a section of the track which we consider
probable but unconfirmed".1 He then gave a map reference of
SU527699.
There were no 'Memoirs of
the Geological Survey' in 1867, but Rudge did at least correct this to 1862
in 'Lost Trackway'. In that, he paraphrased the report, but I shall give it
in full here. The 'Memoirs' state that the passage is "from the Note-book of
Mr. Aveline": "By the side of the road, west of Holly Wood, N.N.W. of
Thatcham, there are some conglomerate-stones. These were grubbed up in the
wood when it was being cut down. I was told that some of great size had been
found, and that they were taken up nearly in one line".2 In 'Lost
Trackway', Rudge then gave another grid reference, SU527700. This is about
half a mile south-west of the previous stone.
It should be noted that in
the 'Memoirs' no specific location was given, so the coordinates are
meaningless. Also, the number of stones found isn't given, so where did
Rudge get his 'five stones' from? And finally, how these stones 'nearly in
one line' were orientated isn't stated at all, so how could they point to
Thatcham in one direction, and Pangbourne in the other? There certainly was
an early Mesolithic flint working floor found at SU50176689 in 1921, in
marshes beside the river Kennet - but the reason for it being 'on the Track'
should never have been an unknown number of stones in an uncertain location
in a line of unknown direction 'pointing towards it'.
1. E.A. & E.L. Rudge: 'The
Conglomerate Track' in 'Essex Naturalist' Vol.29, part 1 (March 1952), p.20
(read 24/11/51.)
2. H.W. Bristow: 'Greywethers'
in 'Memoirs of the Geological Survey of Great Britain: The Geology of Parts
of Berkshire & Hampshire' (1862), p.51.
Kintbury, Berks
"In nearby field" (only
mention 'The Lost Trackway', 1994):
"Others [other boulders]
were reported in a nearby field (SU385667.)" This is all the information
given, but the location seems to be the edge of a field just west of the Hop
Gardens housing estate, that was built in about 2008. The field and the land
beneath the new housing was home to several chalk pits, and in that space
was also a 'whiting works', extracting constituents from chalk for products
such as putty and whitewash. Undoubtedly the boulders were unearthed from
these pits, where quarrying continued up to the 1960s. This is about nine
miles WSW from Holly Wood. Although they were mentioned in 'Lost Trackway'
after the next entry, the location clearly places them to be
encountered before the next site, the stones said to have been along
Kintbury High Street, which begins about 250m to the north-west.
Kintbury, Berks
"Along the main street"
(only mention 'The Lost Trackway', 1994):
In his later years, Dr.
Rudge was ever more tentative about the route of the Track, relying in the
end on the diminishing number of reported puddingstones that came to him,
and on his intuition. Thus he had to say "The precise site of the river [Kennet]
crossing is uncertain, but a report that a series of boulders once stood
along the main street of Kintbury, on the south bank, suggests that the ford
once existed somewhere near here." He didn't specify that they were all
puddingstones - although that's obviously the inference - but sarsens are
also very common in the village and surrounding area, which is on the
southern side of the Kennet and Avon Canal.
Kintbury
High Street, which runs east to west, is very narrow, with narrow pavements.
After the Blue Ball pub it narrows even further, and the rest of the street
going westwards has no pavements at all - therefore stones set against walls
and corners for protection would be a good idea. If there was such a
series of boulders at one time, there is now only one definite conglomerate,
a deeply-pitted boulder perhaps a metre high, set against the corner of
No.48a. This is on the south side of the High Street at SU3806666867, quite
possibly the narrowest part of the road (photo on the left from Google
Street View.)
Outside the 19th century
Blue Ball Inn (north side, at SU38136686) there is a large sarsen right by
the front door, a small one at the west corner, and a smaller one still by
the next house. Further along the High Street there are small rocks
obviously placed there in recent times to protect verges, but there are
sarsens also in roads to the east, such as Station Road and Newbury Street.
Hungerford,
Berks
"Standen Manor Farm" (only
mention 'The Lost Trackway', 1994):
Another correspondent told
Rudge of a stone here, adding "It is the only conglomerate boulder to be
found at this place." Standen Farm lies at SU32266617, with the Manor
slightly to its north. Both are about 1¼ miles SSW of the outskirts of
Hungerford, and nearly 3½ miles west of Kintbury. Perhaps the boulder was
the only one left when Rudge's correspondent visited, but historically,
Standen Manor and the surrounding area was well-known for conglomerate.
In 1873 for example, "Conglomerates of a very different
composition are also observed in places, as at Standen, near Hungerford,
where the pebble-beds contain masses of 'Pudding-stone'".1 Less
than three-quarters of a mile away is a field where in 1862 there were "some
large blocks of 'pudding-stone', which seem to be in place, and are perhaps
hardened masses of the 'pebble-beds' of this formation".2 Indeed,
the whole area south-west of Hungerford is known to contain an outlier of
what used to be called the Reading Beds, the geological layer in which
puddingstone was formed. It should also be noted that the remains of an old
chalk pit can be found no more than 30m from Standen Farm.
1. 'Report of the
Marlborough College Natural History Society', 1873.
2. W. Whitaker: 'Outliers
of the London Basin - on the North' in 'Memoirs of the Geological Survey of
Great Britain: The Geology of Parts of Berkshire & Hampshire' (1862), p.26.
Shalbourne,
Wilts
"Eastcourt Farm" (only
mention 'The Lost Trackway', 1994):
A puddingstone "was
reported at Eastcourt Farm (approximately SU320665), one mile from Stype."
Eastcourt Farm is indeed roughly a mile from Stype, but it's also 1¼ miles
from the map reference given by Rudge. It can actually be found at
SU31746460, beside Annett's Lane in the parish of Shalbourne, which is just
over the border into Wiltshire. Rudge's coordinates would have it to the
north, right next to Standen Manor. Exactly where the stone was at the farm
was not given, but just as with Standen, it's right within the known Reading
Beds formation.
Little Bedwyn,
Wilts
"Post Office and Manor
House" (only mention 'The Lost Trackway', 1994):
Back in 1955, Rudge had
been unable to positively trace his Track any further westward than the area
west of Henley-on-Thames. He said that "Careful search in the districts
around Newbury, Berks, produced nothing more than the discovery of a short
series of puddingstone boulders leading from Hungerford in a south-westerly
direction to the village of Little Bedwyn, and it is impossible to state at
present whether or not this series is connected in any way to the main
alignment".1 Since he never wrote of any actual stones in
Hungerford, he could only have been referring to those just described at
Standen Manor and Eastcourt Farm (neither of which he visited), and now at
Little
Bedwyn itself. A 'short series' indeed, and since he seemed to decide that
it was connected, here the Track has to suddenly veer to the
north-west for about 1¾ miles.
In 'Lost Trackway' he wrote
of "a stone standing opposite the Post Office, and two others opposite the
Manor House".2 The village is built on both banks of the river
Dun, with a road bridge and footbridge connecting the two halves. On the
western side, directly opposite the footbridge, is the house that used to be
the Post Office. Between this house and its neighbour is a gravelled
access-way, and at the corner of a wall beside it is a small, rounded
puddingstone boulder (photo top left, from Google Street View) only about
20cm high (SU2907266034.)
The Georgian Manor House has a wide frontage along both Oak Hill and the
High Street, on the east side of the river. In Oak Hill, the House stands
opposite the Manor farmyard and stables. Spaced out along and against the
farmyard wall are three small boulders. At the northern end is a sarsen,
resting on the surface. In the middle, embedded beside the road is a
conglomerate about 30cm across and 20cm high, at SU2917765986 (photo bottom
left, also from Street View.) That at the southern end of the wall is also
embedded and seems to be a conglomerate, but it's very small and has
the appearance of having been planed flat on one face.
There are various small
sarsens scattered throughout the village, including a nice one at the
junction of Church Street and School Lane on the west bank, which an old
photograph shows was there in 1912. One that Rudge missed - if he ever
actually came here - is very close to this, a large puddingstone in the back
garden of Old Manor Cottage at SU2904166084.
1. E.A. Rudge: 'Further
Observations on the Conglomerate Track' in 'Essex Naturalist' Vol.29, part 4
(1955), p.256.
2.
E.A. Rudge (ed.
John Cooper): 'The Lost Trackway' (1994), p.21.
Great Bedwyn,
Wilts
"Near railway station"
(only mention 'The Lost Trackway', 1994):
And so to the very last
stone on the Puddingstone Track, again requiring a sudden change in
direction - this time, SSW for a mile. Great Bedwyn is almost entirely on
the west bank of the river Dun. Here, according to Rudge, "a large boulder
stands near the railway station." That may have been true once, but no
longer. Houses have been built, roads widened and realigned, verges and
green spaces reshaped.
The grid reference given in
'Lost Trackway' of SU278645 is not very near the station, and when checked
against the 1945 and 1960 One Inch OS maps, could also cover the village
centre. At SU2782664557, on the grass verge outside No.14 High Street, is a
largish and embedded boulder of sandstone. Other small rocks are resting on
the surface, and seem modern placements. A photograph of the mid-1950s shows
no such stones here at that time, so whether they have any relevance to
Rudge's search, I don't know.
Puddingstone would not be
uncommon in this area. Talking about sarsens, a text of 1873 says "in the
neighbourhood of Great Bedwyn, and occasionally elsewhere, they take the
form of pudding-stone, being agglomerations of flint pebbles, cemented
together in a matrix of siliceous sand".1
1. Rev. John Adams: 'On
the Sarsen Stones of Berkshire and Wilts' in 'The Geological Magazine'
Vol.10 (1873), p.198.
***********
And there the hypothetical
Puddingstone Track petered out. With no reported stones to guide him after
Great Bedwyn, Dr. Rudge nevertheless speculated that the line may have
passed through Everleigh and Figheldean, to cross a ford at Milston 14 miles
away. It was intuition that told him the Track would then pass Woodhenge at
Durrington, to terminate at its ultimate goal, Stonehenge. The same
intuition that, at different times, told him that it was aiming for Avebury,
for Hampshire, and once, briefly, for Dorset.
And one final thought.
For all that he imagined puddingstones forming a cultural link between
Grime's Graves and Stonehenge, including the supposed stone circles at
Chesham and Stonor, Rudge never seems to have noted one simple and
significant fact: of the 93 visible stones at Stonehenge, not a single one
is a puddingstone.
The Age & Purpose of the
Track
►
Back to Contents ► |